Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2888 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3667U - 303 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 20 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
303
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |