Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 276 days older than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $64.03 vs $191.98
- Up to 66% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2600 - $0.43 vs $1.27 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $191.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |