Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1853 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $109.99 vs $344.98
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-13700K - $0.74 vs $2.09 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
35%
Price, $
$344.98
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $344.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |