Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2325 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-4130 - 151 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $52.02 vs $85.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73888 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |