Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8305G outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8305G is 1291 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4160T - 102 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8305G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8305G
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake G | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
