Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8305G outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8305G is 657 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Athlon 3000G - 402 vs 393 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8305G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8305G
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Kaby Lake G | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
