Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8305G outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8305G is 1242 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 127 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-8305G
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake G | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
