Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - 511 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $55.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-7400T - $0.12 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
