Key Differences
In short — Core i5-660 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-660 is 1020 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-660 - $48.02 vs $149.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-660 - $0.29 vs $0.89 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7203 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |