Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6400 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6400 is 794 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-6350 - $79.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - $0.44 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4893 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |