Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1311 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 59% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-8150 - 113 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than FX-8150 - $0.8 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $82.02 vs $90.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58292 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
71
62.83185840707964%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
68.96551724137932%
Price, $
$82.02
100%
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |