Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 125 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 165 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $100.0 vs $128.3
- Up to 15% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4440 - $0.66 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $128.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2603 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |