Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550S outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550S is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 255 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $95.0 vs $149.95
- Up to 32% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3550S - $0.4 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
67.79661016949153%
Price, $
$149.95
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4147 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
236
92.54901960784314%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |