Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4271 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - 212 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $90.48 vs $149.95
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - $0.43 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
171
80.66037735849056%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
48.86363636363637%
Price, $
$149.95
60%
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4129 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
24.197431781701447%
Multi-Core
1698
20.26252983293556%
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |