Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 332 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Core i5-3317U - 687 vs 679 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 6 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
687
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |