Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i5-2520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 818 days newer than Core i5-2520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2520M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2520M - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2520M - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2520M | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |