Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 2186 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $34.95 vs $52.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7400T - $0.27 vs $0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-2400 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 35 vs 95 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |