Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $37.0 vs $242.17
- Up to 83% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i5-13600KF - $0.27 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
17%
Price, $
$242.17
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9283 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |