Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 896 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $129.99 vs $499.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.82 vs $3.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 48 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
150
94%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
24%
Price, $
$499.99
25%
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for $499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
