Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 29% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 172 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $140.0 vs $576.53
- Up to 81% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.81 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
77%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
18%
Price, $
$576.53
24%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |