Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $140.0 vs $529.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-14900F - $0.62 vs $2.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11600 - 238 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
27%
Price, $
$529.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |