Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900K - 414 vs 397 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $332.99 vs $528.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.84 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
414
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
65%
Price, $
$528.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
397
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$332.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $332.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |