Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-4765T - 248 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $498.95 vs $576.53
- Up to 10% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.09 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
90%
Price, $
$576.53
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
239
96%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |