Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 46% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 773 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $528.99 vs $576.53
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.68 vs $1.09 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
529
68%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
62%
Price, $
$576.53
91%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
773
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$528.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |