Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 31 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $493.91 vs $547.2
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7920X - $3.71 vs $4.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 135 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
98%
Value, $/FPS
$3.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$493.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $493.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Buy for $547.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |