Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1699 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 93% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 321 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $349.0 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
51.71339563862928%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
42%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75200 minutes ago
Buy for $349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
43.49925705794948%
Multi-Core
7539
46.47105960673119%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |