Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $819.3 vs $899.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
93.38235294117648%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
100%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74120 minutes ago
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.91044776119402%
Multi-Core
7539
66.42876024319322%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |