Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1950 days newer than Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 42% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7920X - 785 vs 553 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
553
70%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$552.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $552.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |