Buy on Amazon
$498.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-4765T - 233 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $435.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 20% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-4765T - $1.87 vs $2.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i7 i7-4765T Quad-core (4 Core) 2 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150OEM Pack - 1 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 3 GHz Overclocking Speed - 22 nm - 3 Number of Monitors Supported - Intel HD 4600 Gr
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
