Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1555 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900 - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 189 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $542.74 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
183
96.82539682539682%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$750
72%
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Buy for $542.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
45.50478997789241%
Multi-Core
7407
45.09314501400219%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |