Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1555 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 480 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $435.0 vs $499.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.91 vs $1.23 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
406
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
73%
Price, $
$499.99
87%
Buy for $499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |