Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 2934 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11260H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |