Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $78.02 vs $99.95
- Up to 23% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-10400F - $0.41 vs $0.53 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |