Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-750 - 267 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $72.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 16% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-10400F - $0.31 vs $0.37 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
83%
Price, $
$99.95
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for $72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |