Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $55.99 vs $99.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-10400F - $0.64 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |