Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Valorant than FX-8150 - 779 vs 682 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $64.03 vs $99.95
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-10400F - $0.09 vs $0.13 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
779
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
69%
Price, $
$99.95
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |