Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10210U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10210U is 2305 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |