Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 2227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 71% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1610 - 120 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - $37.0 vs $198.94
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-9350KF - $0.53 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
31%
Price, $
$198.94
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |