Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T and the cheaper Celeron G3930 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930 - 163 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $19.65 vs $75.0
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Buy for $19.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
54.48028673835126%
Multi-Core
1043
46.150442477876105%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |