Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6320 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6320 is 667 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 6 than EPYC 7551P - 117 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 64 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Skylake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
