Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6320 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6320 is 1541 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 3000G - 129 vs 123 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6320 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
