Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6320 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6320 is 358 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 172 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
