Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 730 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 139 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $92.54 vs $109.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.67 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $92.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |