Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 1785 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - $68.02 vs $153.17
- Up to 46% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 4600G - $0.13 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-6300 - 539 vs 529 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
529
98.14471243042672%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
539
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
54.16666666666667%
Price, $
$153.17
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
80.17789072426937%
Multi-Core
2539
41.439529949404275%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |