Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1405 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-6300 - 245 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $83.28 vs $92.61
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-6300 - $0.34 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $92.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |