Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 293 days older than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $78.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-6100 - $0.27 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |