Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $52.02 vs $85.0
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74031 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |