Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1065 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i3-550 - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |