Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1616 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i3-4150T - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $189.95 vs $219.95
- Up to 15% better value when playing Stray than Core i3-4150T - $1.04 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 24 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |