Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2185 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4150T - 154 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $150.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-4150T - $0.97 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8823 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |